Income Protection Insurance Claim Denied: How to Appeal

Income Protection Claim Denied: You Have the Right to Fight Back

Income protection insurance — also called disability income insurance — is designed to provide a financial lifeline when illness or injury stops you from working. It is arguably the most important insurance product most people own. And yet, claim denials for income protection policies are among the most common, most damaging, and most vigorously contested disputes in the insurance industry.

If your income protection claim has been denied, or if your insurer is paying out less than you believe you are entitled to, this guide explains why these claims are denied, how to build a strong appeal, and what regulatory and ombudsman options are available to you.

---

Why Income Protection Claims Are Denied

Income protection claim denials tend to cluster around a small number of recurring issues:

1. Disputes Over the Definition of "Disability"

This is the single most common cause of income protection claim denials. How your policy defines "disability" determines everything. There are two main definitions:

• Own Occupation: You are considered disabled if you cannot perform the specific duties of your own occupation. This is the more favorable definition for the policyholder. A surgeon who loses the fine motor control needed to operate may be "disabled" under this definition even if they could theoretically work as a GP.

• Any Occupation: You are considered disabled only if you cannot perform any occupation for which you are reasonably suited by education, training, or experience. This is much harder to claim under. Insurers using this definition will argue that even if you can no longer do your old job, you can do some other job.

• Modified or Hybrid Definitions: Many policies switch from own occupation to any occupation after a set period (often two years). This "definition change" is a major source of disputes, where an insurer initially pays under own occupation and then terminates the claim when the definition shifts.

2. Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions

Most income protection policies exclude disabilities caused by conditions that existed — or for which the policyholder received medical treatment or advice — within a specified period before the policy started (commonly 3 or 5 years). Insurers frequently deny claims by arguing that the disabling condition is actually a pre-existing one.

3. Mental Health and Stress-Related Claims

Mental health conditions — including anxiety, depression, PTSD, and burnout — account for a growing proportion of income protection claims, and a disproportionately high share of disputes. Insurers often deny these claims arguing that the condition is not severe enough to prevent work, or that it falls within a mental health exclusion clause.

4. Inadequate Medical Evidence

Income protection claims require robust medical evidence: specialist reports, GP records, functional capacity assessments, and sometimes independent medical examinations (IMEs). Denials often follow when the insurer's own doctor (paid by the insurer) disagrees with your treating physician.

5. Non-Disclosure at Application

If the insurer discovers that you did not disclose a material health condition when you applied for the policy, it may avoid the policy or deny the specific claim as related to the undisclosed condition.

6. Benefit Offset Disputes

Many policies reduce the income protection benefit by the amount of other income you receive — such as workers' compensation, government disability payments, or income from part-time work. Disputes arise about what counts as an offset and how it is calculated.

7. Returning to Work Disputes

If your insurer believes you have recovered sufficiently to return to work, it may terminate benefits. This is contested when you believe you remain disabled or when you have attempted a partial return to work and the insurer uses this as evidence of full recovery.

---

The Appeals Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1: Get the Full Denial Rationale in Writing

Request a complete written explanation of the denial. This should include:

• The specific policy clause(s) relied upon
• The medical evidence the insurer used in its decision
• Whether an independent medical examination was conducted
• The name and qualifications of any medical reviewer who advised the insurer

You are generally entitled to this information. In most jurisdictions, you have the right to request a copy of your complete claims file.

Step 2: Obtain Your Own Medical Evidence

The most powerful tool in contesting an income protection denial is strong, independent medical evidence. This means:

• Detailed reports from your treating specialists (not just your GP)
• Functional capacity evaluations conducted by independent allied health professionals
• Psychiatric assessments (for mental health claims) from a registered psychiatrist
• Neuropsychological testing results where brain injury or cognitive impairment is involved

If the insurer relies on an independent medical examiner (IME), you have the right to challenge the IME's report and to obtain a second opinion.

Step 3: Challenge the Definition of Disability Applied

If your insurer has applied the wrong definition of disability — for example, using "any occupation" when your policy clearly uses "own occupation" — this is often the strongest ground for appeal. Obtain a legal opinion on the correct interpretation of the policy wording. Many insurance lawyers offer free initial consultations.

Step 4: Submit a Formal Internal Appeal

Write a comprehensive internal appeal letter to the insurer's complaints or appeals department (not the claims team). Your appeal should:

• Identify every ground on which the denial is incorrect
• Attach all new medical evidence
• Challenge any flawed methodology (for example, an IME that failed to review your complete medical history)
• Reference any breach of the insurer's obligation to act in good faith
• State the outcome you seek (reinstatement of benefits, back-payment of denied benefits)

Give the insurer a reasonable deadline — typically 20 to 30 business days — to respond in writing.

Step 5: Escalate to the Financial Ombudsman or Regulator

If internal appeal fails, escalate to the relevant external dispute resolution body in your jurisdiction:

• Australia: Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) — afca.org.au. AFCA can award up to AUD 1,085,000 for income protection disputes and its decisions are binding on insurers.
• United Kingdom: Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) — financial-ombudsman.org.uk. FOS handles income protection disputes and can award up to £415,000.
• New Zealand: Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) — ifso.nz.
• Ireland: Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (FSPO) — fspo.ie.
• Malaysia: Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS) — ofs.org.my.
• USA: File a complaint with your state insurance department. There is no federal insurance ombudsman for private disability insurance, but state regulators can investigate bad faith claims handling.

All of these ombudsman services are free to consumers. Filing does not require legal representation.

Step 6: Consider Legal Action

For high-value income protection disputes, engaging a specialist insurance law firm is often worthwhile. In Australia and the UK, no-win-no-fee arrangements are common for disability insurance litigation. Courts in most common law jurisdictions have consistently ruled that insurers must apply the policy definition correctly and cannot arbitrarily substitute their own judgment for that of the treating physician.

---

Special Considerations: Mental Health Claims

Mental health income protection claims require particular attention:

• Obtain comprehensive psychiatric documentation from a treating psychiatrist, not just a GP.
• Keep a detailed diary of how your condition affects your daily functioning and your capacity to work.
• Challenge any IME that does not adequately account for the episodic nature of many mental health conditions.
• Many jurisdictions limit mental health income protection benefits to two years. Check your policy carefully.

---

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Not appealing because you assume denial is final. It never is. Ombudsman statistics consistently show that a significant proportion of appealed income protection denials are overturned.

Waiting too long. Limitation periods apply. In most jurisdictions, you have at least one year, and often longer, to pursue a dispute. But the sooner you appeal, the better your evidence.

Accepting the insurer's IME result without challenge. IMEs commissioned by insurers are frequently criticized for being biased. You have the right to challenge these reports and to present your own expert evidence.

Failing to document the impact on daily life. Ombudsmen and courts look at the functional impact of your condition, not just the diagnosis. Keep detailed, dated records of your symptoms and limitations.

---

Getting Help Drafting Your Appeal Letter

A compelling income protection appeal letter must address the definition of disability correctly, challenge the insurer's medical reasoning, and present your evidence clearly. ClaimBack at claimback.app can help you generate a professional, structured appeal letter tailored to your specific denial reason and jurisdiction. An effective letter dramatically improves your chances at both the internal appeal stage and before an ombudsman.

---

Conclusion

An income protection claim denial does not have to be final. The combination of strong independent medical evidence, a correctly applied disability definition, and a formal escalation to an ombudsman or court has successfully overturned thousands of wrongful denials. Act promptly, document everything, challenge every unfounded assumption in the insurer's decision, and use every resource available — including ClaimBack at claimback.app — to fight for the benefits you paid for.