What Is Medical Necessity in Insurance? And How to Prove It

Your claim was denied as "not medically necessary." But what does that actually mean? And how do you prove it's wrong?

This guide demystifies medical necessity—what it means, how insurers define it, how it differs from standard medical practice, and exactly how to prove your treatment meets the standard.

What "Medically Necessary" Actually Means

Here's the gap in understanding:

Your definition: A treatment your doctor recommends and you need.

The insurance definition: A treatment that meets the insurer's clinical criteria AND is appropriate for your diagnosis AND doesn't exceed the insurer's cost guidelines AND isn't considered experimental by the insurer.

These aren't the same.

The Insurer's Real Definition

Insurers typically use one of these:

Definition 1: "Appropriate, proven treatment for a recognized medical condition" Translation: Standard treatments for conditions they accept. Not experimental. Not new. Established.

Definition 2: "Treatment meeting [specific guideline] criteria" Translation: Your case must match their guidelines exactly. If it doesn't, they deny.

Definition 3: "Treatment that improves function or extends life materially" Translation: The treatment must have a significant benefit. Minor improvements may not qualify.

Definition 4: "The least expensive appropriate treatment" Translation: If cheaper alternatives exist, they may deny the more expensive option.

Here's the trick: most insurers don't publish their exact definition. They keep it vague.

How Insurers Actually Determine Medical Necessity

Insurance companies use frameworks to evaluate medical necessity. Understanding these helps you win.

Framework 1: Milliman/InterQual Guidelines

Many insurers use Milliman or InterQual clinical criteria to evaluate necessity.

What these are: Computerized systems that evaluate cases against evidence-based criteria. They're standardized, but they're conservative.

Problem: They don't account for individual variation. If your case is slightly different from their criteria, they deny.

How to challenge: Show that your specific situation warrants an exception to the criteria.

Framework 2: Insurance Medical Reviewer

The insurer employs (or contracts with) doctors to review cases.

What happens: They read your file and decide: approve or deny.

Problem: They work for the insurer. They're incentivized to deny (saves the insurer money).

How to challenge: Request peer-to-peer review so your doctor can explain directly.

Framework 3: Evidence-Based Guidelines

Some insurers actually follow clinical guidelines (NCCN, ASCO, etc.).

What this means: If your treatment aligns with major guidelines, approval is likely.

How to win: Cite the guidelines in your appeal.

Medical Necessity vs. Standard of Care—They're Different

Here's a crucial distinction most people don't understand:

Standard of Care: What most doctors do for your condition. Medical Necessity: What the insurance company thinks you should pay for.

They're not the same.

Standard of care is determined by:

• Clinical guidelines from specialty societies
• Peer-reviewed research
• What doctors actually practice
• Consensus among specialists

Medical necessity is determined by:

• Insurer's clinical criteria
• Insurer's cost analysis
• Insurer's review process
• Insurer's financial goals

Example: A newer, slightly more effective medication might be standard of care (doctors routinely prescribe it), but the insurer says it's not medically necessary (because the older, cheaper medication works too).

Your job in an appeal: show that standard of care = medical necessity.

How to Prove Medical Necessity

Step 1: Get Your Doctor's Written Opinion

This is the foundation. Your doctor must write that the treatment is medically necessary for your specific condition.

The letter should explain:

• Your diagnosis and clinical findings
• Why this treatment is necessary (clinical reasoning)
• What would happen without it (prognosis)
• Why alternatives aren't appropriate (if applicable)
• How long this has been standard practice
• Why you're an appropriate candidate

Example: "[Patient] has been diagnosed with [condition]. Clinical findings include [specific test results/symptoms]. The standard treatment for this condition is [treatment]. In this patient's case, [treatment] is medically necessary because [specific clinical reasons]. The alternative approach of [alternative] would be less effective because [reasons]. Without [treatment], this patient faces [specific medical risks]. This recommendation aligns with current clinical practice and professional guidelines."

This letter is your most powerful evidence.

Step 2: Cite Clinical Guidelines

Guidelines are objective, respected, and hard to argue with.

Major guidelines by specialty:

• Oncology: NCCN, ASCO, ESMO
• Cardiology: ACC, AHA, ESC
• Orthopedic: AAOS, ACR
• Psychiatry: APA, NICE
• Specialty societies: Check your doctor's specialty association

How to use: Print the guideline passage. Highlight it. Reference it in your appeal.

"According to the [Guideline Name], [treatment] is recommended for patients with [diagnosis]. This aligns with my situation. The insurer's denial contradicts this established guideline."

Insurers can't easily argue with major guidelines.

Step 3: Show Disease Severity

Medical necessity often depends on how severe your condition is.

Gather evidence of severity:

• Test results showing abnormality level
• Lab values outside normal ranges
• Imaging showing disease extent
• Specialist assessments of severity
• Documentation of symptom impact
• Prior unsuccessful treatments (if applicable)

Severe cases get approval more often. Mild cases might be denied even if medically appropriate.

Show your condition is serious enough to warrant intervention.

Step 4: Prove It's Not Experimental

If the insurer claims the treatment is "experimental," rebut this.

What counts as established (not experimental):

• FDA approval (if applicable)
• Published clinical trials (multiple studies)
• Inclusion in clinical guidelines
• Widespread use by practitioners
• Insurance approval for similar cases

Gather this evidence:

• FDA approval letter (if applicable)
• Published studies (even 1-2 major studies help)
• Guideline citations
• Evidence of how many doctors prescribe this treatment

Show the treatment is established, not new.

Step 5: Address the Insurer's Specific Objection

Don't just argue "it's necessary." Address their specific reason for denial.

If they said "not proven": Cite published research, guidelines, and clinical use.

If they said "first-line treatment should be tried first": Either show you did try it, or explain why it's inappropriate in your case.

If they said "cost is prohibitive": Argue cost-effectiveness if possible, or simply note that cost isn't an appropriate medical necessity criterion.

If they said "similar alternative available": Explain why the alternative won't work as well.

Go directly to their objection and rebut it.

The Role of Your Doctor in Medical Necessity

Your treating doctor is the expert in your condition. Their role is crucial.

Your doctor should:

• Explain the clinical reasoning (not just "I think it's good")
• Reference guidelines or evidence
• Address the insurer's specific objection
• Be willing to do a peer-to-peer review
• Stand firm on the medical judgment

Your doctor should NOT:

• Exaggerate the condition
• Make unsupported claims
• Argue with the insurer (that's your job)
• Back down immediately if challenged

Find a doctor willing to advocate for your treatment. Some doctors are more willing than others.

How Insurance Companies Define "Necessary" (Cynically)

Be realistic about what insurers mean:

Necessary = profitable to cover Not necessary = costs more than we want to pay

Insurers frame it in medical terms, but it's often financial.

This doesn't mean appeals are hopeless. It means understand the real game:

The insurer saves money by denying. You save money (and your health) by appealing. The external reviewer is supposed to be neutral.

This is why independent reviewers often overturn denials—they're not financially incentivized to deny.

Medical Necessity by Condition Type

Different condition types have different necessity standards:

Emergency/Acute Conditions: Usually easier to prove necessary (treatment is urgent). Focus on proving urgency.

Chronic Conditions: Harder to prove necessary (might be managed without treatment). Focus on proving standard of care.

Preventive Treatments: Hardest to prove necessary (preventing disease is different from treating it). Focus on guidelines and risk factors.

Mental Health: Variable by country (much stronger in some countries than others). Focus on clinical guidelines and symptom impact.

Know your condition type and adjust your strategy.

Common Medical Necessity Arguments That Work

Argument 1: "This is standard of care" Back this with: guidelines, research, evidence of how doctors practice.

Argument 2: "The insurer's criteria are outdated" Back this with: current guidelines that have evolved beyond what the insurer is using.

Argument 3: "This patient is unique" Back this with: specific clinical factors making standard alternatives inappropriate.

Argument 4: "Cost-effectiveness" Back this with: this treatment prevents more expensive complications.

Argument 5: "Guidelines require this" Back this with: printed guideline passages.

These arguments work because they're fact-based and hard to dispute.

Red Flags: When Medical Necessity Claims Are Weak

Be honest about when you might not win:

• Your condition is very mild
• No doctor has clearly recommended the treatment
• No guidelines support it
• Much cheaper alternatives exist
• The treatment is experimental or very new
• Your doctor is the only one recommending it (outlier)

In these cases, you might still appeal (external review might overturn), but be realistic about chances.

Medical Necessity in Different Countries

Standards vary:

USA: ACA requires coverage of treatments deemed medically necessary by the doctor.

UK: NICE guidelines are quasi-legal—denying treatments NICE approves is hard.

Australia: ACL and AFCA favor medical necessity based on medical evidence.

Singapore/Malaysia/Hong Kong: Standards are increasing but less established than Western countries.

Know your country's standard.

How ClaimBack Can Help

Writing a persuasive medical necessity argument is complex. You need to:

• Translate your doctor's judgment into insurance language
• Find and cite relevant guidelines
• Address the insurer's specific objection
• Organize evidence professionally

ClaimBack can analyse your case and write your appeal letter in minutes — Start Free →

You provide your denial letter, medical records, and doctor's judgment. ClaimBack generates a professional medical necessity argument tailored to your specific situation and the insurer's specific objection.

Final Checklist: Building Your Medical Necessity Case

• I have a detailed letter from my doctor explaining medical necessity
• I have researched clinical guidelines for my condition
• I have printed relevant guideline passages
• I have gathered medical records showing disease severity
• I have addressed the insurer's specific objection point-by-point
• I understand the insurer's criteria (Milliman, InterQual, custom)
• I have evidence that the treatment is established, not experimental
• I am prepared to request peer-to-peer review
• I have organized evidence professionally

Medical necessity is subjective. That's why appeals work. Use that.

---

Disclaimer: ClaimBack provides AI-generated appeal assistance for informational purposes only. ClaimBack is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Always review your appeal letter before sending and consider professional advice for complex or high-value claims. Regulatory processes vary — always verify current procedures with your insurer or regulator.

---

Ready to fight your denial? ClaimBack analyses your case and writes a professional appeal letter in minutes — Start Free →